Divisive Online Safety Bill Becomes Law In The UK


After years of debate, the government’s controversial Online Safety Bill, which, according to the government, aims to make the internet safer for children, has become law. It seeks to force tech firms to take more responsibility for the content on their platforms.

Technology Secretary Michelle Donelan said it “ensures the online safety of British society not only now, but for decades to come.” But critics have raised concerns about the implications for privacy. WhatsApp is among the messaging services that has threatened to withdraw from the UK over the act.

The new law puts the onus on firms to protect children from some legal but harmful material, with the regulator, Ofcom, being given extra enforcement powers. It introduces new rules such as requiring pornography sites to stop children viewing content by checking ages. Platforms will also need to show they are committed to removing illegal content including:

• child sexual abuse

• controlling or coercive behaviour

• extreme sexual violence

• illegal immigration and people smuggling

• promoting or facilitating suicide

• promoting self-harm

• animal cruelty

• selling illegal drugs or weapons

• terrorism

Other new offences have been created, which are cyber-flashing – sending unsolicited sexual imagery online – and the sharing of “deepfake” pornography, where AI is used to insert someone’s likeness into pornographic material. The Act also includes measures to make it easier for bereaved parents to obtain information about their children from tech firms.

Powers in the Act that could be used to compel messaging services to examine the contents of encrypted messages for child abuse material have proved especially controversial. Platforms like WhatsApp, Signal and iMessage said they can not access or view anybody’s messages without destroying existing privacy protections for all users, and have threatened to leave the UK rather than compromise message security.

Proton, a mail platform with a focus on privacy, says it would be prepared to fight the government in court if it is asked to alter its end-to-end encryption. The government has said the regulator Ofcom would only ask tech firms to access messages once “feasible technology” had been developed. Wikipedia has also previously said it would not be able to obey some of the Act such as age verification.

While the Act is often spoken about as a tool for reining in Big Tech, government figures have suggested more than 20,000 small businesses will also be affected. Breaking the rules could result in fines of up to 10% of global revenue for tech companies, or £18m – whichever is bigger. Their bosses could also potentially face prison time as a punishment.

Ofcom said it will draw up codes of conduct that will provide guidance on how to stay within the new rules, with its first draft codes coming on 9 November. The boss has also addressed some of the concerns raised about its new role. “Ofcom is not a censor, and our new powers are not about taking content down. Our job is to tackle the root causes of harm,” said the regulator’s CEO, Dame Melanie Dawes. “Importantly, we’ll also take full account of people’s rights to privacy and freedom of expression,” she added.











Share post:




More like this

Boxing: Deontay Wilder To Face Zhilei Zhang On 1 June

American heavyweight Deontay Wilder who recently signed with Matchroom...

Super Eagles Star, Boniface Makes History, Becomes Third Nigerian to Win Bundesliga

Super Eagles of Nigeria and Bayer Leverkusen forward, Victor...

Osimhen, Amusan Make List Of Forbes’ 30 Under 30 Class of 2024

Super Eagles striker Victor Osimhen and track icon Tobi...


Sterling Bank, in collaboration with the Africa Export-Import Bank...