UK Government Approves “Online Safety Act” Allowing Publication Of False Information

Date:

Recently, the UK Government enacted the “Online Safety Act,” marking a significant shift in its approach to misinformation. Under this legislation, disseminating false information is deemed a criminal offense, carrying a penalty of up to a year in prison. However, a noteworthy exception exists within the law: traditional media outlets, commonly referred to as legacy media, are granted immunity from prosecution for publishing misleading content.

Section 179 of the Online Safety Act outlines the parameters of this offense; stating that individuals knowingly spreading false information with the intent to cause harm, either psychological or physical, are in violation of the law. Nevertheless, section 180 explicitly exempts recognised news publishers from liability under section 179, as well as holders of broadcasting licenses issued under the Broadcasting Act of 1990 or 1996.

These provisions are enacted without delving into the specifics of how regulatory bodies like OfCom define “misinformation.” With the European Union’s Digital Services Act set to take effect soon and recent discussions at Davos highlighting concerns about misinformation and disinformation, it is evident that the focus of these regulatory efforts is squarely aimed at online platforms.

The implications of this legislation extend beyond the confines of national borders. With the global community increasingly interconnected, the ramifications of such regulatory decisions are felt worldwide. The “Online Safety Act” not only influences how information is disseminated within the UK but also sets a precedent for other nations grappling with similar challenges in the digital age.

In light of these developments, questions arise regarding the balance between freedom of speech and the regulation of online content. While combatting misinformation is undoubtedly crucial, the methods chosen to address this issue must be carefully considered to avoid inadvertently stifling free expression, and diversity of viewpoints. As governments around the world navigate the complex landscape of online communication, finding a delicate equilibrium between safeguarding against harmful content and preserving fundamental liberties remains a pressing challenge.

 

 

 

 

Share post:

Subscribe

spot_imgspot_img

Popular

More like this
Related

STERLING BANK AND AFREXIMBANK LAUNCH INNOVATIVE SUPPLY CHAIN FINANCING SOLUTION

Sterling Bank, in collaboration with the Africa Export-Import Bank...

MONIEPOINT MICROFINANCE BANK INTRODUCES NEW USSD SERVICE

Moniepoint Microfinance Bank, renowned as Nigeria's leading bank for...

FCTA WARNS PROPERTY DEVELOPERS TO VERIFY LAND OWNERSHIP BEFORE PURCHASE

The Federal Capital Territory Administration (FCTA) has issued a...

FIRST BANK LAUNCHES DIGITAL EXPERIENCE CENTRE IN BANANA ISLAND, LAGOS

First Bank of Nigeria Limited has unveiled its new...